AUTHOR / 01
A byline you can actually check.
The links below let you inspect work published under my name. The hosts hold the records; I can manage my own uploads and profiles.
What I do here
I handle scoped human checks and read Chinese company records for buyers. Self-service reports use the automated retrieval and review process. I work in Chinese and English, with AI help for drafts, translation and code.
How pages are researched, what counts as evidence and how corrections work is set out in the editorial policy. What a paid check can and cannot establish is in the trust centre.
Verifiable record
This list records links checked on 31 August 2026. One row was added on 17 September 2026. Access and files can change; check the record’s date and version before citing it.
Scroll the table sideways to compare each record, its link and what it shows.
| Record | Where it lives | What it shows |
|---|---|---|
| Research corpus | Dated studies on this site | Each study carries its method, query dates and limits. Follow its dataset links to inspect the deposit and version. Multiple deposits or observation periods do not turn one sample into independent studies. |
| Study dataset, archived | DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21867383 (Zenodo) | A study deposit. Read its methods, files and stated limits. |
| Study dataset, archived | DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21897194 (Zenodo) | A second study deposit, with its own date and version. |
| Study dataset, archived | DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.33845302 (figshare). Page: name lookup study | Added 16 September 2026. 310 Chinese firm names from US recall notices. 167 found no record. Counts only. |
| Author profile | Figshare | Study material from this site, archived under my name. |
| Open-source USCI validator | china-usci on npm · source on GitHub | A checksum tool for China's Unified Social Credit Code, the ID at the centre of the checks this site describes. |
| Professional profile | My public profile. Profile details are self-reported. |
A listing shows the author details supplied with that item. It does not prove authorship, quality or a customer outcome. The editorial policy explains how to question a claim.
Boundaries
I never endorse a supplier. If a supplier shows you a Currawong report as proof that we vetted them, that is a misuse of it. What protects you if I am unavailable is stated on the About page, together with the registered operating entity behind the site.
Questions readers ask
Are you a licensed investigator, an auditor or a law firm?
None of the three. This desk retrieves registered records and reads them for buyers. We do not certify suppliers, write legal opinions or issue credit ratings. A check tells you what a record said on a stated date. What that means for your contract is a question for your own advisers.
You say you use AI. Does AI produce the findings?
AI helps me draft, translate, restructure and write code. AI output is not a source and is not cited as evidence. Findings must trace to a named source and query date. I remain responsible for the published pages; automated checks do not prove that every claim has been reviewed by a person.
Why does one person’s name matter on a page like this?
Because somebody has to answer when a reading is wrong. The corrections process is published, every finding names its source and query date, and the registered operating entity is on the About page. A byline that nobody can check adds nothing to a record, so this page lists where my work actually lives.
Contact
Email hello@currawongweb.com. I answer it myself, in English or Chinese. For corrections to any page, use the process in the editorial policy.