Original measurement106 companies
Can you find a Chinese company by its English name?
An English name can help you find candidates. It does not confirm who your supplier is. Ask for the Chinese registered name and 18-character code on the business licence, then compare them with the record.
1. A matching name field appeared for 47 of 106 inputs
We searched all 106 names in our 9 August 2026 list of China-based trailer manufacturers in NHTSA vPIC. The wider list had 2,589 China-based makers. This search test used the 106 trailer makers. It does not cover all Chinese suppliers.
| Measure | Result | Of |
|---|---|---|
| Returned at least one candidate | 57.5% | 61 of 106 |
| : top candidate has an English name on its registration record | 83.6% | 51 of 61 |
| : that recorded English name equals the input | 77.0% | 47 of 61 |
| : top candidate carries an 18-character Unified Social Credit Code | 83.6% | 51 of 61 |
| All inputs: top result has a matching English-name field | 44.3% | 47 of 106 |
The match links your input to text in a search result. The public file does not show a separate identity check for each result. An empty field or a name that differs also does not prove that it is the wrong firm.
If a result lacks a code, ask for the Chinese registered name and business licence. You may still be able to check the firm using that name.
2. Brand names returned candidates for 20/22; full names for 13/22
Twenty-two entries carried both a full name and a brand or short name. Searching the same group both ways gave these return counts:
| Input | Returned a candidate |
|---|---|
| Full registered English name | 59.1% (13 of 22) |
| Brand or short name | 90.9% (20 of 22) |
Brand inputs returned more results in this group. The first write-up gave examples of wrong firms. The public CSV does not list those results or count how many were wrong. It cannot show how often a brand search found the wrong firm.
Short names can refer to more than one firm. Check who each result refers to. This test did not measure why brand searches returned more results.
More returned results do not establish more correct matches. Keep search return counts separate from identity checks.
3. Ask for the licence before choosing a search result
- Start with a candidate. The 47 matching fields in this group were leads for further checks. They were not 47 verified supplier identities.
- Check the first result before using it. Search rank does not establish identity.
- Ask for the business licence (营业执照). It carries the registered Chinese name and 18-character code, turning a search problem into a lookup.
- A refusal is evidence too. A supplier unwilling to provide a business-licence photo has not proved fraud. But it has blocked the shortest route to confirming the entity.
- Compare the transaction parties. Match the registered name and code against the licence, dated records and order documents. An English-name match does not establish who is contacting you.
4. Method, and what this study cannot say
Each name from vPIC was submitted to a licensed Chinese business-information platform from a mainland network egress. This reports the dated workflow used for the study; it does not establish access from other locations today.
For searches with candidates, we retrieved the top result from the same platform and compared its English-name field with the input. Normalisation used uppercase text with non-alphanumeric characters removed. This tests text equality, not whether two records refer to the same legal entity.
The study reports two runs seven hours apart with the same totals. Both used the same platform. This is not a check against a separate source. Equal totals do not prove that each result stayed the same or was correct.
What it cannot say
- It is one dated group. The 106 trailer makers do not stand for all Chinese exporters. This test gives no upper bound for other sectors.
- The paired comparison has 22 entries. It counts search returns. The public file does not say how many firms were checked against a separate source.
- Other name sources were not measured. These results do not predict the success rate for Alibaba storefront names or names from other sectors.
- A matching English name confirms nothing else. Status, scope, export capability and counterparty identity are separate checks.
- One platform, one date. Coverage differs between providers and changes over time. The measurement date travels with the numbers.
Questions about this study
Can I find a Chinese company using only its English name?
An English name can return a candidate. In this dated group of 106 China-listed trailer makers, 61 searches returned candidates. The top result had a matching English-name field in 47 cases: 77.0% of returns, or 44.3% of all inputs. A name match does not confirm identity. Ask for the Chinese registered name and business licence, then compare the records.
Did brand names find the right firm more often?
In the 22-name paired group, brand or short names returned candidates for 20 inputs, compared with 13 for full names. These counts show how often a search returned something. The public file does not count how many results were the right firm. It cannot show which search method was more accurate.
What does a matching English name actually prove?
It shows that the name text matches after case and punctuation are removed. It does not prove who the firm is, whether it still trades, what it can make or who speaks for it. Compare the Chinese registered name and code with dated records and your order documents.
Is 44.3% good or bad?
It is a result from one dated group on one platform: 47 of 106 inputs had a top candidate with a matching English-name field. It is not a success rate for suppliers in general or an upper bound for other sectors. Use these counts with the method and limits stated here.
Citing this study
Wording corrected 8 September 2026. The values and query date are unchanged. Older archives say “confirmable”. This means the name text matched; it does not mean the firm’s identity was proved. The public summary does not include each query response.
You may quote or reproduce these figures, including commercially, provided the measurement date, frame and limits travel with them. Machine-readable metrics with numerators and denominators are in the data file. The frame comes from our census of Chinese manufacturers in NHTSA vPIC, which readers can re-derive from the vPIC API.
Archived copies, each with its own DOI, resolving independently of this site: Zenodo · Harvard Dataverse.
A citation with everything it needs:
Currawong, “Can you find a Chinese supplier from its English name?”, 106 China-listed trailer manufacturers from NHTSA vPIC searched by the name held in that register from a mainland egress, two same-platform runs, 12 August 2026.
https://currawongweb.com/verify/find-chinese-company-by-english-name/Dataset:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21907920
BibTeX
@dataset{currawong_english_name_lookup_2026,
author = {Bao L. Zhou},
title = {{English-name lookup rates for Chinese manufacturers (NHTSA vPIC frame, August 2026)}},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Zenodo},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.21907920},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21907920}
}NEXT CHECK
Use the name as a search lead.
Search for candidate registered names, then ask for the licence to confirm the Chinese name and code. These dated study results do not measure your current search.
Have an English name but no business licence? Search for candidate registered names, then compare the licence name and code before choosing a company.
If you want records pulled for your own supplier: the “Just check who they are” selection of the report menu lets you choose the records to check. Packs from $26.55. First paid order: unhappy for any reason, tell us within 14 days of delivery and it is refunded in full.