China supplier report sample: an L3 reviewed conclusion

What is in the entry-level self-service pack?

The Identity & compliance pack has five paid checks. The order also lists a free registry snapshot. Each query depends on the source and its coverage.

• Identity match. Checks the name, code and legal representative you enter as a set. It returns one verdict. The registered values are not returned.
• Administrative licences. Shows recorded permissions, with their scope and dates. Permission alone cannot show what the firm does in practice.
• Production licences. Shows certificates held by the entity. These records cannot prove current output.
• Tax status. Shows general VAT taxpayer status and tax credit records. It does not identify who will invoice you.
• Regulator checks. Shows dated inspection records. Few or no rows can mean the firm was rarely checked.

This list describes the pack contents. It contains no query results. The fictitious format example shows five example lines drawn from different checks. Some are outside this pack.

Review the selected checks and current total before ordering. Each delivered line names its source and query date. An empty result describes that source on that date; it is not a clearance.

Why is the sample company named?

The named company records below come from a real query, run on 14 August 2026 against 宁波均胜电子股份有限公司 (Ningbo Joyson Electronic), a company listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange. The company and displayed document numbers are not anonymised. The page does not reproduce every returned field: the L1 street address is summarised to its province, and some sections show selected rows. Those display limits are labelled. No values in these named company records are invented or padded.

These examples show past query results. Your order confirmation states the checks you chose and their delivery window.

The displayed company records name no individuals. See our privacy policy for how we handle report data.

This company is not a client. These records illustrate the report format; they are not an assessment of the company. Other suppliers may have different record coverage. See the 45-company coverage study below.

SAVED FREE SNAPSHOT

L1: Registry snapshot (free)

A saved example of the free search output. A new search depends on source availability; a candidate still needs to be matched to your documents.

What L1 settles: which registered entity the search returned and its recorded status. If there is no match, confirm the Chinese name and code before choosing further checks.

What L1 cannot do: it reads one snapshot. It does not check licences, tax status, court records or ownership, and it carries no human reading of what the fields imply.

SAVED COMMERCIAL-SOURCE RECORDS

Saved platform records and the L3 scope

L3 starts from $128: $89 base + $39 per selected record category, delivered in 3 business days after payment confirmation. It adds a human answer to the agreed question, with evidence, next steps and review details. See the complete illustrative L3 report above.

The examples below came from an Identity & compliance pack query on 14 August 2026 through the upstream data service. They illustrate returned fields; they are not a completed human official-portal report or a list of checks included in every L3 order. Taxpayer status and certificate issuer checks require a separate agreed scope if they are not on the L3 selection menu.

Administrative licences: 15 records returned

Four things in that table are worth more than the count of fifteen.

• The bank account change. This record is dated 21 December 2017. It does not confirm the current account or the beneficiary on your invoice. Use the bank-account checks for that decision.
• Three change registrations on a single day (2020-07-29). Registration data is not stable furniture: when I checked the saved 264-name frame, 145 of 264 logs (54.9%) showed a change date in the prior year. Full source-list verification remains open.
• A planning permit is the only line here that touches physical premises. Even it describes a permission, not a running plant.
• The last row’s document number is a dash. The registry returned -, so we print -. Several rows also carry an end date of 2099-12-31 or 9999-12-31. Those are placeholders, not expiry dates. Do not treat these values as verified expiry dates.

These records cover working-hours approvals, registration changes, a merger decision and a planning permit. They are not evidence of manufacturing capability.

General VAT taxpayer status: 2 records

Both rows start in June 2016, but their labels and status flags differ. The sample preserves both. These rows alone do not establish current invoice eligibility; confirm the invoicing entity and the invoice you need.

Stated limit: taxpayer status says nothing about who actually invoices you. An affiliated exporter may be the entity on your invoice, and, per the bank-account record above, the account may have changed.

Spot checks & random inspections: 1 record

A special-equipment routine supervision inspection: plan 甬高市监抽查计划〔2021〕1号, task 甬高市监抽查〔2021〕9号, carried out by 宁波市市监局高新分局 on 2021-07-13, check type 定向 (targeted, not random). A regulator actually looking, on a dated plan.

Stated limit: covers only checks regulators actually ran, and the most recent one here is from 2021. Few entries can mean lightly inspected instead of clean.

Qualification certificates: no records found

The query returned 经查无结果: no records found. That describes this dataset on the query date. It does not establish whether the company or a subsidiary holds a certificate elsewhere.

No result is not proof of absence. If a certificate matters to your order, ask for its number, holder and issuer, then check whether it covers the contracting entity and product.

What L3 adds: a human conclusion within the selected scope, with evidence, a next step, sources, dates and gaps. For a self-service L2 data query, review the separate self-service menu and published prices. Confirm the selected service and total before ordering.

What L3 cannot do: it reads records. It cannot see the factory floor. Person-level records follow a tiered default: the legal representative is named in a delivered report to the buyer, other individuals are withheld unless separately unlocked. On this public page no individual is named at all. That is the line we hold, and it is the only one.

L3 / COMPLETE ILLUSTRATIVE REPORT

A closed case: what can the buyer conclude?

Fictional example. No client is represented. The company and figures are reused from our existing specimen. Source references, review details and the question below show the L3 format. No official source was queried and no real case was reviewed to create this example.

Question reviewed

We are buying hardware parts. Does the 2019 enforcement entry show an unpaid balance for that case at the query date?

Conclusion

No. The example entry is marked satisfied and closed. It does not show an unpaid balance for that case at the stated date. The CNY 84,000 figure is the amount recorded for the old case; it should not be described as a current unpaid balance.

Key evidence and impact

The registration example identifies the entity. The enforcement example records a 2019 case for CNY 84,000 and states that it was satisfied and closed. The case status changes how the amount should be read. A count of one enforcement record, without that status, would leave out a fact that matters to this question.

Next step

Keep the dated case extract with the supplier file. If a later record or claim suggests this same case remains unpaid, obtain the case reference and a fresh status check before relying on this answer. A question about other debts needs a separate scope; this review does not answer it.

Sources and category outcomes

In a real report, each purchased category has an outcome even if its source is inaccessible or no record is found. A gap that prevents an answer is stated in the conclusion, with the evidence needed to resolve it.

Limits of this conclusion

This example covers two categories for one entity on one date. It does not cover other debts, penalties, dishonest-debtor records, related companies, contract and payee alignment, account ownership, product certificates or a factory visit. It gives no assurance of delivery or payment safety. No source result, signature or client outcome on this example is real.

Review details

Reviewed by: Example reviewer (fictional). Review date: 2 August 2026 (illustrative). A delivered L3 report states the actual human reviewer and review date. Human review does not imply a separate second reviewer.

Request a report for your own question → The request form, agreed scope and delivered report use the same selected categories. L2 self-service queries remain a separate product.

ON-SITE SERVICE SCOPE

What does L4 add from $169 per man-day, quoted by scope?

No completed on-site report sample is available yet. Use this section to understand the service scope.

What it is, stated plainly: a person goes to the address, in mainland China, and reports what is there. Scheduled within 7 business days of payment confirmation; report within 2 business days after the visit; exact dates confirmed in your written quote.

What a visit can help you check:

When we have delivered an L4 with a client willing to have a version published, it will appear here. Until then this section stays as it is: a description of scope, not a sample.

HOW FULL IS IT, ACTUALLY

How many of the 540 record queries returned content?

We queried twelve record types for 45 selected company codes on 21–22 August 2026. Of 540 calls, 279 returned content and 261 returned no records. None failed. The table shows how often each type returned content in this group.

The 45 codes were selected from a 106-name China-listed trailer frame. Selection followed English-name search results; it did not independently confirm each legal entity or its manufacturing role. See the selection method and limits.

On 6 September 2026 the same 45 codes and twelve dimensions were queried again. 43 of the 45 had the same returned statuses and counts. Administrative-penalty results rose from 9 of 45 to 11 of 45; two codes each returned one record after previously returning none. Across the compared statuses and counts, nothing dropped out. The companies are left unnamed. These counts do not establish when the underlying penalties occurred.

Shareholder, annual-report and registry-snapshot queries each returned content for 44 of 45 codes on both dates. Matching counts do not show that their contents or identities were unchanged. Keep the query date beside each line and read the actual record before relying on it; these two runs do not establish which record type will change next.

See the group and selection method in the NHTSA manufacturer study. The registry snapshot came back as a PNG image. Its fields need to be read from that image; the response did not provide them as structured data.

What an empty result establishes

The platform returned no records for operating anomalies or serious violations for any of the 45 companies in the 21–22 August 2026 queries. That is a result for this source on those dates. It does not establish that no such records exist elsewhere, or that a supplier is free of risk. Coverage and publication delays can affect what a platform returns.

Branch offices returned content for 8 of 45 companies; no branch records were returned for the other 37. Judicial assistance returned content for 3 of 45. Those counts describe the records returned. They cannot establish whether branches or proceedings exist. A failed query is recorded separately as an access failure; none of the 540 calls in this batch failed.

Shareholders, annual reports and the registry snapshot each returned content for 44 of 45 firms: one firm had no result in each category. Change records returned content for 41 of 45: four had no result. Ask about a missing record when it affects your decision; these counts alone do not explain the gap.

These counts describe returned records, not what your report will cost. Review the selected checks and total on the order page. An empty search result does not mean the buyer receives a free check.

Where to start

• Have a supplier name already? Run the free search. When the source is available, compare returned candidates with the licence and deal documents.
• Have an 18-character code? Check its structure in your browser before anything else. It catches transcription errors for free.
• Need dated records with sources named? Request a China-side check, or read the published menu and prices first.

This page describes report structure. It is not legal advice, not a conformity assessment, and not a judgement about any company named on it.

Related: See the company check scope · What the deep check adds on top